NEWS #96

 

From July 4, 2010 to July 25, 2010

July 25, 2010

John Townsend sends this article titled 'SP-500, GLD and GDX - Sentiment Trumps Everything', originally on TSI Trader.

July 22, 2010

Today I am puzzled. It will take a while to explain to you why I am puzzled. So, please be patient and bear with me as I show you some 'items' that I have been pondering.

ITEM ONE is a link to this article titled 'More Troubling Housing and Employment Data', by Richard Suttmeier on Minyanville.Com. I quote it below.

ITEM TWO is this. Yesterday morning Red and White D and I were engaged in conversation. He challenged me in a 'where's the beef' moment to show him where exactly the deflation is occurring in our economy. All I could demonstrate at that moment was that home prices were still going down. Given Richard Suttmeier's quote above, it looks like that trend is going to continue. But I left that conversation with something nagging me...in the back of my head...something that was telling me that more deflation should be happening right now. But, if it is, what is it? Where is it? And why is no one talking about it yet?

ITEM THREE is this. Yesterday I posted Tobby Connor's article, which contained the following graph.

What this graph intimates is that the top in the gold price should occur about in the middle of the 2009-to-2016 eight-year cycle, with those two years marking the bottoms. When I read the chart, that projects a top to occur along about 2012. It is a reasonable asssumption. What do we know that is happening that could very well make that particular timing true? We know that gold becomes popular in economically scary and hard times. See item four below.

ITEM FOUR is this. We knew two years ago that mortgage resets were going to be higher in the summer of 2010 than they were in 2009, that last summer was just a breathing period of sorts. Then resets were due to jump to very high levels this summer, right now. Item one in my list above would seem to indicate that the resets are happening, and that our nearly ten percent unemployment is exacerbating the situation. We also knew two years ago that the summer of 2010 would be the prelude to even higher levels of mortgage resets in the summer of 2011.

ITEM FIVE is this. In our morning conversation Red and White D also wondered why mutual funds were suffering outflows. Well, I did some research and found that they are not. Here is a link to 'Fund Flows Turn Positive in June', by Sonya Morris on MorningStar.Com. I quote it below.

THE PUZZLE is this. If deflation is happening as I believe. It should show up in mutual fund inflows. They should decrease, and here is why. When you lose your job your 401k/IRA is probably one of the few nest eggs you have. After being unemployed for a year, you are going to have to tap into that fund. The fact that housing is also taking a dump, means you can not get any cash out of that. In fact, you may be losing your house and that process will put an even bigger strain on your finances. The unemployed will have to tap the 401k/IRA. But the story above, in item five, would indicate that is not happening.

Granted, the 90 percent who still have jobs are still contributing to 401ks. Their contributions create a huge amount of inflows for the mutual funds. But inflows should still have taken a hit, and should take an even bigger hit a year from now. This piece of the financial puzzle does not make sense to me. Mutual Fund inflows is precisely where some deflation should be happening, and it should be happening right now. I am puzzled. Help.

July 21, 2010

Tobby Connor sends along this posting:

July 14, 2010

Rich Kolon sends this link to 'John Lee: Focus on Junior Miners' on SeekingAlpha.Com. I quote the article below.

Here is a link to 'Are We Trending Toward Deflation or Already in It?', by Mike Mish Shedlock on MinyanVille.Com. I quote the article below.

Verily, Mr. Shedlock. The FED led that horse to water. The horse won't drink.

What a lot of pundits miss right now, or completely dismiss, is the importance of sentiment. Those that do incorporate sentiment into their thinking often do not differentiate between long term and short term sentiment.

Short term sentiment can differ wildly from the long term, and visa versa. I can be bullish about markets over the next month or two, while being strongly bearish about the markets over the next year or two.

The FED/Fed can not have it both ways

The FED/Fed can and did come in with $Trillions to bail out financial institutions. That relieved short term fears (sentiment) about those institutions. But, from a longer view, those actions spell nothing but trouble (sentiment) ahead. The FED/Fed can and did act. But they can not now retreat from the implications of those very same actions. When investors (of all sizes) look at those actions they have to ask themselves:

Are these the actions of policy makers who are confident in the economy --- or are these the actions of policy makers scared senseless by what they see looming on the horizon?

Oh yes, Bubble Boy Ben, you can do the deeds. But you can not escape the implications of those deeds.

The FED/Fed may as well have spelled out the long term implications in neon. And that is just one of the reasons I say we are in a Depression. The FED/Fed's own behaviors would indicate that that is where we are. No wonder banks are loaning a lot less now and consumers are borrowing a lot less right now. And the markets? A lot of private investors are simply out of the markets...leaving the big boys in the ring to bash each other's brains out.

Oh yes, Bubble Boy Ben, you can do the deeds. But your deeds kill any long term positive sentiment.

July 13, 2010

Tobby Connor sends along this posting:

July 12, 2010

John Townsend sends this article titled 'Can the Stock Market Continue Rising? Gold, Too?', originally on TSI Trader.

July 8, 2010

Keith sends this article titled 'How Low Could the S&P 500 Go?', by Hao Jin on SeekingAlpha.Com.

The Orange Section sends this note.

Past performance would indicate that both parties believe in big government. Democrats want more programs that make the world 'better and safer' for the unfortunate. Republicans want programs that make the world 'better and safer' for big corporations.

But you are right about the middle class extending their lifestyles/luxuries on borrowed money. That is what happened. I too have hopes that the Depression we are living through will change people's attitudes toward debt.

What has struck me lately is just how bad the State Governments are. Without being able to print money out of thin air, like Washington, the various states still managed to create complete debacles of government finance. Impressive in a strange way. But this is not your old man's recession. This thing is going to go on many more years and the State Governments will hit the wall hard. Then, and only then will honest discussions occur about the true and propper role of government in our lives. It will be this discussion, held in 50 different venues, that will perculate ideas up to the Federal level. I hope it will be a mild but broad sweeping revolution of sorts.

July 7, 2010

John Townsend sends this article titled 'SP-500, GLD and GDX - Down More or Now Up?', originally on TSI Trader.

.............

Here is a link to 'Behind the Scenes Analysis of Economic Headlines', by John Mauldin on Minyanville.Com. I quote the article below.

July 6, 2010

Keith sends this link to 'Corporate America sits on cash hoard', by Joanna Slater of TheGlobeAndMail.Com. I quote it below.

In response to this article, the Orange Section sends this note:

............

I find it interesting that the period we have just witnessed was a period where we had, thanks to heavy-handed government interference, both Deflation and Inflation simultaneously.

Housing devaluation and mortgage deleveraging have caused, and are still causing, huge asset deflation. Meanwhile, thanks to the largess of Uncle Sugar, stocks have shown rebounds in prices that are completely unwarranted...asset inflation. What a weird world we live in.

Here is a link to an article where I think the author got it wrong. Perhaps he can not read a chart.

'Why Are Home Prices Falling Again?', by Andrew Jeffery on Minyanville.Com.

When Mr. Jeffery says:

I could not be in more agreement with his words. But do take a close look at the chart he presents about the relationship between the S&P 500 and Home Prices. When I look at that chart, what leaps out at me is that the declines in Home Prices lead the declines in the S&P, not the other way around.

That really is fitting. Even the guys running the funds, the guys making the big bucks are watching their own Home Prices decline. That can not be encouraging, even to them, let alone to the masses in the middle class. You lose value in your biggest asset, and it has to hurt.

And the corresponding rise in the stock market...and your 401k?

Well, that is iffy, isn't it? We all know that markets can swing wildly, and that the old 401k could be in the toilet next month. But the house, that was something you could always count on. Its value always inched up. Now it inches down.

July 5, 2010

If deficit spending is so great...

O.K., let's follow the assumption that deficit spending by big government is wonderful, a panacea, a cure-all for everything that is wrong.

Who got the money...the real money...lots of it....and go ahead and do what you would normally do with it kind of money:

THE BANKS.

The banks got the dough alright, many large manufacturing corporations are sitting pretty, with lots of cash on hand. But nobody has cash like the banks have cash when Uncle Sugar is throwing it at them by the barge-load. Compared to small business, like Roma Pizza, a small pizza establishment, about a block from my house, the banks are swimming in cash.

What are they doing with it?

THEY ARE NOT LOANING IT.

But loaning money is how they make their money isn't it?

Well, yes, kinda sorta. They also make substantial money playing securities.

THAT IS WHY WE HAVE ASSET INFLATION RIGHT NOW IN THE STOCK MARKETS...AND WHY FALLING MARKETS ARE GOING TO HURT THE PROFITS OF MOST BANKS.

So, banks have tons of cash, but are sitting on it and/or playing the markets with it.

RIGHT.

And the consumers who make up 70 percent of the economy can't get/or don't want loans.

RIGHT.

And the banks themselves, how has the 'rescue/stimulus' affected them internally? Have they been hiring?

No, actually, like other really big businesses, they have been using the grace period given them by the FED to become leaner and meaner.

They have been laying off? They have fewer employees than when this thing started?

RIGHT.

It seems that the most stimulated businesses (banks) in our economy have not been positively affected by the 'rescue/stimulus' at all. Huh? Is that how stimulus is supposed to work?

NO, BUT IT IS THE BEST WE HAVE, THE BEST HUMAN MINDS HAVE EVER BEEN ABLE TO DEVISE...

July 4, 2010

Sean Blair sends this article:

.............

Tobby Connor sends along this posting: